Season | Goals |
2009-10 | 33 |
2010-11 | 53 |
2011-12 | 60 |
2012-13 | 55 |
2013-2014 | 51 |
Average Rate of Change:
(2, 53) to (3, 60) = 3-2/ 60-53 = 7
(2, 53) to (4, 55) = 4-2/ 55-53 = 1
(1, 33) to 2,53) = 2-1/ 53-33= 20
The calculations were done by using the slope of the line. If you pay attention you see that Ronaldo has been increasing his performance since the slopes are positives but that he has not been increasing the amount of goals per season.
Instantaneous Rate of Change:
We use the IRC to get closer and closer to a relationship we want to analyze. In this case Ronaldo's performance as a soccer player. It is done also by taking the slope of the points we want to analyze.
We calculate the IRC the following way:
(2, 53) to (3,45)
We take the slope so: 3-2/ 45-53 = -8
(1, 15) to (2,53)
We take the slope so: 2-1/ 53-15 = 38
We take the IRC by analyzing the two slope points we just calculated. Therefore we have
(-8+ 38) / 2 = 15
The 15 shows the IRC for Ronaldo during his second year as a player in Real Madrid. This shows that he has been improving from his first season to the next but taking into consideration that we had a negative slope of -8 in one of the points we must not overlook the fact that his goal average has been decreasing over the past years. Therefore even though Ronaldo did well in his second season and the ones that follow his increase in amount of goals may not seem so impressive when applying the IRC to be more specific.
aah, ronaldo! everyone's favorite! nice example, juan.
ReplyDeletemost of your calculations are accurate. your secant line calculations are accurate, however, i would have ordered them sequentially (to see the increase) as it makes it look like your info is a little skewed. secondly, your calculation of the IRC should have been done by drawing a line tangent to the point (2, 53) and calculating the slope of that line. it looks like your calculation is accurate, but you just didn't follow the directions for part g.
all in all though, a good job.
professor little