Monday, October 6, 2014

Tim Linthicums ERA and Instantaneous Rate of Change

Introduction: Tim Linthicum is one of Baseball's top pitchers. Since you are a huge fan of baseball and math you want to find a way to relate the two. You think to yourself and realize that you can further your understanding of instaneous rate of change by finding the instaneous rate of change in Tim's ERA during his 5th year in the major. So, what is the instantaneous rate of change in Tim's ERA during his fifth year in the majors. Use the chart below to figure it out.



 Tim Linticum's ERA from 2007-2014
   


Year
ERA
2007
4.00
2008
2.62
2009
2.48
2010
3.43
2011
2.74
2012
5.18
2013
4.37
2014
4.74



Average Rate of Change:

(5, 2.74) to (6, 5.18)

(6 - 5) / (5.18 - 2.74) = .41

(5, 2.74) to (7, 4.37)

(7-5) / (4.37 - 2.74) = 1.23

(4, 3.43) to (5, 2.74)

(5-4) to (2.74- 3.43) = -1.45


The calculations of the ARC show the slope of the line between two points on the graph. If the slope of this line is positive that means that Tim's ERA went up between those two years and if the slope is negative, it means that Tim's ERA went down between those years.


Instantaneous Rate of Change:

To find the instantaneous rate of change during Linthicum's 5th year in the major you have to take the two points above and below the 5th years ERA and that will narrow down the selection to IRC. You find this by determining the slope of the tangent line.






(5, 2.74) to (6, 3.45)

(6-5) / (3.45 -2.74) =1.408

(4, 2.13) to (5, 2.74)

(5-4) / (2.74 - 2.13) =1.639

The IRC with most likely be directly in between these two numbers.

(1.408 + 1.639) / 2 = 1.523 ERA

 The IRC in this situation shows the instant rate of change during Tim's 5th year in the majors for his ERA. Basically it is means there was around a 1.523 ERA decrease in TIm's ERA in his 5th year in the majors.



2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. jack,

    i am guessing you are a baseball fan! i liked your topic and especially the way you set it up. your secant line calculations are accurate and your table is well done. i was a little confused with your IRC calculations as it doesn't appear that you calculated two points from the tangent line. it looks like you calculated four points around the point 2.74. also, just little more clarity in explaining your IRC results...in 2011, tim's ERA was decreasing at a rate of (whatever units) per year.

    otherwise, nice job!

    prof little

    ReplyDelete