Tim Linticum's ERA from 2007-2014
Year
|
ERA
|
2007
|
4.00
|
2008
|
2.62
|
2009
|
2.48
|
2010
|
3.43
|
2011
|
2.74
|
2012
|
5.18
|
2013
|
4.37
|
2014
|
4.74
|
Average Rate of Change:
(5, 2.74) to (6, 5.18)
(6 - 5) / (5.18 - 2.74) = .41
(5, 2.74) to (7, 4.37)
(7-5) / (4.37 - 2.74) = 1.23
(4, 3.43) to (5, 2.74)
(5-4) to (2.74- 3.43) = -1.45
The calculations of the ARC show the slope of the line between two points on the graph. If the slope of this line is positive that means that Tim's ERA went up between those two years and if the slope is negative, it means that Tim's ERA went down between those years.
Instantaneous Rate of Change:
(5, 2.74) to (6, 3.45)
(6-5) / (3.45 -2.74) =1.408
(4, 2.13) to (5, 2.74)
(5-4) / (2.74 - 2.13) =1.639
The IRC with most likely be directly in between these two numbers.
(1.408 + 1.639) / 2 = 1.523 ERA
The IRC in this situation shows the instant rate of change during Tim's 5th year in the majors for his ERA. Basically it is means there was around a 1.523 ERA decrease in TIm's ERA in his 5th year in the majors.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletejack,
ReplyDeletei am guessing you are a baseball fan! i liked your topic and especially the way you set it up. your secant line calculations are accurate and your table is well done. i was a little confused with your IRC calculations as it doesn't appear that you calculated two points from the tangent line. it looks like you calculated four points around the point 2.74. also, just little more clarity in explaining your IRC results...in 2011, tim's ERA was decreasing at a rate of (whatever units) per year.
otherwise, nice job!
prof little